Exposure at the falls

Last weekend I ventured out into one of the national parks near to my home. There’s a well known set of waterfalls at this location, so I thought I’d have a play around with the camera in manual mode. It was late in the afternoon – and it’s winter here in Australia, so the sun is quite low in the sky and was catching just the top of the trees above the falls. I was positioned below the falls, where it was quite dark in comparison to tops of the trees.

I took a number of shots with different shutter speeds and aperture settings, and as expected, the resulting photos were quite mixed and varied. I did have one surprise in that I didn’t blur any of the photos taken at this particular location. I wasn’t so lucky in other parts of the park…

Some of the photos here were taken with a shutter speed of 1/60 second which is the slowest I would normally use without a tripod – I don’t have a steady hand :-)

Due to my inexperience, most of the shots are saturated (overexposed) at the top. Even though the foot of the falls looked quite dark, there was quite a lot of ambient light bouncing around from the direct sunlight hitting the tops of the trees, and the results say as much. I think a slightly faster shutter speed would have helped me here.

So, what am I talking about? Here are some samples.

The two horizontal shots below are the bookends of the series – the most and least exposed. Even the least exposed is a little over cooked though.

And these two vertical shots have a much better balance, but still aren’t quite right…

Well, that’s it for today. These are only 4 shots from a 24 exp film. I’ll write some more about some of the other photos in the coming days.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>